Historiographic discussion on the origin of chinese astronomy
https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2019-20-2-562-579
Abstract
The biggest, but not the only, European mystification about the ancient origin of Chinese astronomy, occurred in the 17th century. According to Chinese sources, astronomy dates back to the middle of the third millennium B.C. The reliability of the sources is debatable. In 213–212 B.C., the emperor Qin Shi Huang ordered the destruction of all manuscripts except palace chronicles and practical books. At the turn of the 2 and 1 c. B.C. the historian Sima Qian wrote the "Records of the Grand Historian". This monumental work outlines the ancient legends and chronicles from the 8 century B.C. For a long time, China was closed to Europeans, the first popular European book about China was written by Marco Polo (13 c.). In the 17-18 centuries, in China the Jesuit mission resided. The mission included 36 astronomers who, with their reports, created among the Europeans an idea of the antiquity of Chinese astronomy. The subsequent discussion questioned this idea. From the 19th century, the Petersburg Academy of Sciences was represented in Pekin. Chinese studies (Sinology) arose due to the work of various missions, and many profound researchers emerged from the missionaries, the remarkable Russian Sinologists were among them. The works of the 19 and 20 centuries continue the debate about the authenticity of ancient sources. We consider the history of this discussion and the main arguments of the parties, including the works of P.-S. Laplace, K. A. Skachkov, G. N. Popov, A. V. Marakuev, N. J. Needham, N. Sivin, E. I. Beryozkina, Cheng-Yih Chen, V. Ye. Eremeyev.
References
1. Sima Qian. 1972–2010. Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji). In 9 vol. Transl. and comments by R.V. Vyatkin. Moscow: Nauka.
2. Yao Fan. 1995. “The ’Zhou Bi Suan Jing’ with comments of Zhao Junqing” // Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki. 1995, №2. P. 129-131.
3. Cullen Ch. 2007. Astronomy and Mathematics in Ancient China: The ’Zhou Bi Suan Jing’. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
4. Cheng-Yih Chen. 1996. Early Chinese Work In Natural Science: A Re-Examination of the Physics of Motion, Acoustics, Astronomy and Scientific Thoughts. Hong Kong: Honk Kong University Press.
5. Gaubil A. 1729–1732. Observations Math’ematiques, Astronomiques, Geographiques, Chronologiques, Et Physiques, Tir’ees Des Anciens Livres Chinois, Ou Faites Nouvellement Aux. Compagnie De Jesus. Vol. 1. Souciet : Paris.
6. Laplas P.-S. 1982. Exposition du Syst’eme du monde/ Transl. by V.M. Vasiliev/ Leningrad : Nauka.
7. M’emoires, concernant l’histoire, les sciences, les arts, les moeurs, les usages etc de Chinois, par les Missionaires de Pekin. 1776–1814. In 16 vol. Gey: Gide. Paris. DOI: 10.3931/e-rara-28735.
8. Feklova T.Yu., Junchen Zhan. 2017. “On the history of the study of China in the XIX century: the natural science aspect of cooperation between the Imperial St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences and the Russian Orthodox mission in Beijing” // Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. №1 (162) P. 27–36. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/k-istorii-izucheniya-kitaya-v-xix-veke-estestvenno-nauchnyy -aspekt-sotrudnichestva-imperatorskoy-sankt-peterburgskoy-akademii-nauk-i (accessed 08.01.2019).
9. Skachkov K. A. 1874. “The fate of astronomy in China” // Zhurnal ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya. St.-Petersburg, Maj. P. 1–31 (separate pagination). Available at: https://www.runivers.ru/philosophy/lib/book7643/420634/ (accessed 08.01.2019).
10. Popov G. N. 1920. History of Mathematics. Vyp. I. Moscow: Tipo-lit. Moskovskogo kartoizdatel’skogo otdela Korp. Voen. Topogr., 1920.
11. Marakuev A. V. 1934. “At the root of ancient astronomy of the Far East” // Doklad, prochitannyj na matematicheskoj konferencii v DVGU, 02.04.1934. Available at: http://astrogalaxy.ru/456.html (accessed 08.01.2019).
12. Needham J. 1959. Science and Civilisation in China. Cambridge University Press, 1959. Vol. III.
13. Sivin N. 1969. “Cosmos and Computation in Early Chinese Mathematical Astronomy” // T’oung Pao. Vol. 55, Livr. 1/3 (1969), pp. 1–73. Published by: Brill. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4527744 (accessed 08.01.2019). Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4527744.DOI :https://doi.org/10.1163/156853269X00069
14. Sivin N. 1973. “Copernicus in China or, Good Intentions Gone Astray” // Sivin N. Science in Ancient China: Researches and Reflections (Collected Studies Series, Cs506). Variorum Reprints. 1995. First published in Studia Copernicana (Colloquia Copernicana, 2; Warsaw. 1973). Part IV. – P. 63–122. Available at: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/ nsivin/from_ccat//cop.pdf (accessed 08.01.2019). DOI: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/ nsivin/from_ccat//cop.pdf
15. “Mathematics in nine books”. 1957. / Translation and notes Eh. I. Beryozkina // Istorikomatematicheskie issledovaniya. 1957. 10. Moscow: Nauka. P. 439–584.
16. Beryozkina E. I. 1980. Matematika drevnego Kitaya ( Mathematics of ancient China). Moscow: Nauka.
17. Cullen Ch. “A review on Chen Cheng-Yih ‘Early Chinese Work In Natural Science’ ” // Isis. 1998. Vol. 89. No. 3, Sep. P. 535–536. DOI: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/384097
18. China’s Spiritual Culture: Encyclopedia in 5 Volumes. – Vol.5. Science, technical and military thought. 2009. Red. M. L. Titarenko, A. I. Kobzev, V. E. Eremeev, A. E. Luk’yanov. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura RAN.
Review
For citations:
Sinkevich G.I. Historiographic discussion on the origin of chinese astronomy. Chebyshevskii Sbornik. 2019;20(2):562-579. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2019-20-2-562-579
Views:
611
Email this article 