Preview

Chebyshevskii Sbornik

Advanced search

EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF HYPOTHESES IN GEOGEBRA

https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2017-18-1-92-108

Abstract

In this paper we propose several hypotheses related to cevias of triangle and the conic sections passing through the grounds of these cevians or via other points. To formulate these hypotheses and implement their experimental test have been used dynamical mathematics environment GeoGebra. Check each of hypotheses <1-<9 was carried out on a specially built for her dynamic model. In all cases, it was experimentally managed conrm the validity of the proposed hypothesis. Search of mathematical proofs of these hypotheses we did not make, and here is something to think about for the reader. Here is the wording of three of the nine hypotheses. Hypothesis <3. In an arbitrary non-degenerate acute-angled triangle, the grounds of the three altitudes and the grounds of three medians drawn from dierent vertices lie on the same circle. Hypothesis <6. Let from each vertex a non-degenerate triangle held the median. Then this triangle is splited into six triangles without common interior points so that their centroids lie on the same ellipse. Hypothesis <9. Let the rst point of the Fermat is inside an arbitrary non-degenerate triangle, and through this point from each vertex held cevian. Then the original triangle is splited into six triangles without common interior points so that their second points of Napoleon lie on the same hyperbola.

About the Authors

A. R. Еsаyan
Tula State L.N. Tolstoy Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

doctor of pedagogical sciences, professor, professor



A. B. Yakushin
L. N. Tolstoy Tula State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

candidate of educational sciences, associate professor, head of department of computer science and information technology



References

1. Akopyan A. V., Zaslavsky A. A., Geometric properties of curves of the second order, –Moscow: Mtsnmo, 2007. — 136 p.

2. Bakelman I. Inversion. Popular lectures on mathematics, Vol. 44, Moscow, Nauka, 1966.

3. Ha N. M. (2005), Another Proof of van Lamoen's Theorem and Its Converse. Forum Geometricorum, volume 5, pages 127-132.

4. Kimberling, C. Central Points and Central Lines in the Plane of a Triangle, Mathematics Magazine 67 (3), 1994, 163–187.

5. Kimberling, C. Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers, available at http://faculty. evansville. edu/ck6/encyclopedia/ETC. html

6. Kimberling, C. Triangle Centers and Central Triangles, Congr. Numer. 129, 1998. p. 1-295

7. Kimberling, С. X(1153) = Center of the van Lemoen circle, in the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers Accessed on 2014-10-10

8. Kin Y. Li (2001), Concyclic problems. Mathematical Excalibur, volume 6, issue 1, pages 1-2.

9. Korn G., Korn T. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers/ M. : Nauka, 1968

10. Osipov N. N., A computer proof of the theorem about incentro. Mathematical educa-tion. Third series, volume 18, M. : Ed. Mtsnmo, 2014, pp. 205-216

11. Steingarts L. A., Orbits оf Zhukov and theorem of Morley. Mathematics in school, №. 6, 2012, pp. 53-61

12. Eric W. Weisstein, van Lamoen circle at Mathworld Accessed от 2014-10-10.

13. http://mathhelpplanet. com/static. php?p=klassifikatsiya-linii-po-invariantam

14. http://wp. wiki-wiki. ru/wp/index. php/Коническое сечение

15. http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Van_Lamoen_circle

16. http://ru. wikipedia. org/wiki/Инверсия_(геометрия)

17. http://ru. wikipedia. org/wiki/Теорема_Чевы


Review

For citations:


Еsаyan A.R., Yakushin A.B. EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF HYPOTHESES IN GEOGEBRA. Chebyshevskii Sbornik. 2017;18(1):92-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2017-18-1-92-108

Views: 877


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-8383 (Print)