GENERALIZED MATRIX RINGS AND GENERALIZATION OF INCIDENCE ALGEBRAS
https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2015-16-3-422-429
Abstract
The paper presents generalization of incidence algebras, which includes the case of generalized matrix rings. Constructions similar to partial ordering and quasi-ordering were introduced - η-poset and η-qoset respectively. The question of invertibility of elements of generalized incidence algebras was studied. The algorithm of finding inverse element and clear formula were found. This formula holds for incidence algebras, in particular. The case of generalized incidence algebra over a field was examined explicitly. In this case we can introduce equivalence relation on the underlying set, under which generalized incidence algebra would have block structure. As with incidence algebras, there is close connection between algebras over η-posets and η-qosets. For example, if we know sizes of equivalence classes, then we can reconstruct algebra over η-qoset by corresponding algebra over η-poset. It was shown that generalized incidence algebras can be viewed as subalgebras of some formal matrix rings of the same size as the underlying set. The problem of isomorphism was studied and it was shown that it can be reduced to the problem of isomorphism of generalized incidence algebras over η-posets. Partial solution to this problem was found. The paper introduces Mobius function of generalized incidence algebra. Analogue of Mobius inversion formula was found and it was shown that basic properties of classical Mobius function are remain to be true. Generalized incidence algebras with so-called {0, 1}-multiplicative system are of peculiar interest. There is good reason to believe that all generalized incidence algebras over a field are isomorphic to algebras with {0, 1}-multiplicative system.
About the Author
D. T. TapkinRussian Federation
References
1. Krylov, P. A. 2008, ”Isomorphism of generalized matrix rings”, Algebra and Logic, vol. 47, pp. 258—262
2. Tang, G., Li, C. & Zhou Y. 2014, ”Study of Morita contexts”, Comm. Algebra, vol. 42, pp. 1668—1681
3. Tang, G. & Zhou, Y. 2013, ”A class of formal matrix rings”, Linear Algebra Appl, vol. 438, pp. 4672—4688
4. Abyzov, A. N. & Tapkin, D. T. 2015, ”On some classes of formal matrix rings” (Russian), Izvestia Vuzov. Matematika, № 3, pp. 1—12
5. Krylov, P. A. & Tuganbaev A. A. 2014, ”Formal matrices and their determinants” (Russian), Fundamental’naya i prikladnaya matematika, vol. 19, № 1, pp. 65— 119
6. Spiegel ,E. & O’Donnell C. J. 1997, ”Incidence Algebras”, New York: Marcel Dekker, 335pp.
7. Sands, A. D. 1973, ”Radicals and Morita contexts”, J. Algebra, vol. 24, pp. 335— 345.
8. Skowronski A. & Yamagata K. 2011 ”Frobenius algebras I: Basic representation theory”, Zurich: European Mathematical Society, 650p.
9. Akkurt, M., Akkurt, E. & Barker, P. 2013, ”Automorphisms of structural matrix algebras”, Operators and Matrices, vol. 7, pp. 431—439
10. Belding, W. R. 1973, ”Incidence rings of pre-ordered sets”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. XIV, pp. 481—509
11. Brusamarello, R. & Lewis D. W. 2011, ”Automorphisms and involutions on incidence algebras”, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, vol. 59, pp. 1247—1267
12. Coelho S. P. 1993, ”The automorphism group of structural matrix algebra”, Linear Algebra and its Appl.,vol. 95, pp. 35—58
13. Khripchenko, N. S. & Novikov B. V. 2009, ”Finitary incidence algebras”, Commun. Algebra., vol. 37, pp. 1670—1676
14. Rota, G.-C. 1964, ”On the foundations of combinatorial theory: I, Theory of Mobius functions”, Z. Wahrscheinlichiketstheorie Verw., vol. 2, pp. 340—368.
15. Scharlau, W. 1975, ”Automorphisms and Involutions of Incidence Algebras”, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 488, pp. 340—350
16. Stanley, R.P. 1970, ”Structure of incidence algebras and their automorphism groups”, Bull. AMS, vol. 76, pp. 1936—1939
Review
For citations:
Tapkin D.T. GENERALIZED MATRIX RINGS AND GENERALIZATION OF INCIDENCE ALGEBRAS. Chebyshevskii Sbornik. 2015;16(3):422-429. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2015-16-3-422-429