Scattering of a plane sound wave by a liquid body of complex shape
https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2025-26-1-164-180
Abstract
The problem of scattering of a plane harmonic sound wave by an obstacle in the form of a liquid body with a non-canonical shape and a piecewise-smooth surface, approximated by a polygonal mesh, is considered. The process model is based on the equations of hydrodynamics for an ideal fluid. Two numerical-analytical approaches to solving the problem are compared: the finite element method (FEM) and the boundary element method (BEM). In the first approach,
the obstacle is enclosed within a sphere, and the domain inside, taking into account the surface of the obstacle, is divided into spatial (3D) finite elements. In this domain, the problem is solved using FEM, which provides the potential values on the sphere. These values are then used to determine the coefficients of the spherical expansion of the scattered wave potential. In the second approach, using the spatial Green’s function for the Helmholtz equation, the problem is
reduced to a system of integral equations over the surface of the obstacle. The Burton-Miller method is also applied to eliminate the non-uniqueness of the solution, and singular integrals are regularized using identities for the static Green’s function. In the BEM, it is sufficient to divide the surface into boundary (2D) elements. The main equations for applying the numerical methods and the results of solving the sound scattering problem for a liquid body in the form of two spheres of equal radius are presented. It is established that to achieve acceptable accuracy in calculating the scattered field, the BEM requires significantly fewer computational resources compared to the FEM.
About the Authors
Dmitry Viktorovich GorbachevRussian Federation
doctor of physical and mathematical sciences
Daniil Ruslanovich Lepetkov
Russian Federation
postgraduate student
Sergey Alekseevich Skobel’tsyn
Russian Federation
doctor of physical and mathematical sciences
References
1. Frisk, G.V. & DeSanto, J.A. 1970, “Scattering by spherically symmetric inhomogeneities”, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 47, no. 1B, pp. 172–180.
2. ¨Uberall, H., George, J., Farhan, A.R., Mezzorani, G., Nagl, A., Sage, K.A. & Murphy, J.D. 1979, “Dynamics of acoustic resonance scattering from spherical targets: Application to gas bubbles in fluids”, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 66, pp. 1161–1172.
3. Burov, V.A. & Rumyantseva, O.D. 2003, “Uniqueness and stability of the solution to an inverse acoustic scattering problem”, Acoust. Phys., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 496–507.
4. Martin, P.A. 2003, “Acoustic scattering by inhomogeneous obstacles”, SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 297–308.
5. Burov, V.A., Popov, A.Y., Sergeev, S.N. & Shurup, A.S. 2005, “Ocean acoustic tomography with a nonstandard representation of refractive inhomogeneities”, Acoust. Phys., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 513–523.
6. Alekseenko, N.V., Burov, V.A. & Rumyantseva, O.D. 2005, “Solution of the three-dimensional inverse acoustic scattering problem on the basis of the Novikov–Henkin algorithm”, Acoust. Phys., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 367–375.
7. Hasheminejad, S.M. & Sanaei, R. 2008, “Ultrasonic scattering by a fluid cylinder of elliptic cross section, including viscous effects”, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 391–404.
8. Burov, V.A. & Shmelev, A.A. 2009, “Numerical and physical modeling of the tomography process based on third-order nonlinear acoustic effects”, Acoust. Phys., vol. 55, no. 4, 482–495.
9. Duck, F.A., Baker, A.C. & Starritt, H.C. (eds). 2020, “Ultrasound in medicine”, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
10. Li, P., Zhai, J. & Zhao, Y. 2020, “Stability for the acoustic inverse source problem in inhomogeneous media”, SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 2547–2559.
11. Skudrzyk, E. 1971, “The foundations of acoustics basic mathematics and basic acoustics”, Springer-Verlag, New York, Wien.
12. Isakovich, M.A. 1973, “General acoustics”, Nauka, Moscow. (In Russ.)
13. Anderson, V.C. 1950, “Sound scattering from a fluid sphere”, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 426–431.
14. Ivanov, V.I. & Skobel’tsyn, S.A. 2008, “Modeling solutions to acoustics using FEM”, Izv. Tul. Gos. Univ., Ser. Estestv. Nauki, no. 2, pp. 132–145. (In Russ.)
15. Skobeltsyn, S.A. 2020, “Some inverse problems of diffraction of sound waves on inhomogeneous anisotropic elastic bodies”, Diss. . . . doc. physics and mathematics Sci., Tula State University, Tula. (In Russ.).
16. Ihlenburg, F. 2013, “Finite element analysis of acoustic scattering”, Springer, New York.
17. Burton, A.J. & Miller, G.F. 1971, “The application of integral equation methods to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 323, no. 1553, pp. 201–210.
18. Brebbia, C.A., Telles, J.C.F. & Wrobel, L.C. 1984, “Boundary element techniques, theory and applications in engineering”, Springer, Berlin.
19. Chen, K., Cheng, J. & Harris, P.J. 2009, “A new study of the Burton and Miller method for the solution of a 3D Helmholtz problem”, IMA J. Appl. Math., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 163–177.
20. Chen, G. & Zhou, J. 2010, “Boundary element methods with applications to nonlinear problems”, 2nd ed., Springer, Dordrecht.
21. Simpson, R.N., Scott , M.A., Taus M., Thomas D.C. & Lian H. 2014, “Acoustic isogeometric boundary element analysis”, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 269, pp. 265–290.
22. Amini, S. 1990, “On the choice of the coupling parameter in boundary integral formulations of the exterior acoustic problem”, Appl. Anal., vol. 35, pp. 75–92.
23. Liu, Y.J. & Rudolphi, T.J. 1991, “Some identities for fundamental-solutions and their applications to weakly-singular boundary element formulations”, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 301–311.
24. Wilton, D.R., Rao, S.M., Glisson, A.W., Schaubert, D.H., Al-Bundak, O.M. & Butler, C.M. 1984, “Potential integrals for uniform and linear source distnbutions on polygonal and polyhedral domains”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 276–281.
25. Lin, T.C. 1984, “A proof for the Burton and Miller integral equation approach for the Helmholtz equation”, J. Math. Anal. Appl., vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 565–574.
26. Jackson, J.D. 1999, “Classical electrodynamics”, 3rd ed., Wiley City, New York.
27. Meyer, M., Desbrun, M., Schr¨oder, P. & Barr, A.H. 2003, “Discrete differential-geometry operators for triangulated 2-manifolds”, In: H.-C. Hege, K. Polthier (eds) Visualization and Mathematics III. Mathematics and Visualization, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg.
28. Khalilov, E.H. 2016, “Justification of the collocation method for the integral equation for a mixed boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation”, Comput. Math. Math. Phys., vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1310–1318.
29. Colton, D. & Kress, R. 2013, “Integral equation methods in scattering theory”, SIAM, Philadelphia.
Review
For citations:
Gorbachev D.V., Lepetkov D.R., Skobel’tsyn S.A. Scattering of a plane sound wave by a liquid body of complex shape. Chebyshevskii Sbornik. 2025;26(1):164-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2025-26-1-164-180