On the solution of the model kinetic equation ES
https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2022-23-3-37-49
Abstract
The article describes a method for finding a solution to a linearized ellipsoidal-statistical kinetic equation (ES) with a homogeneous boundary condition based on the Chebyshev polynomial approximation in the framework of the problem of modeling the axial flow of a
rarefied gas in a long channel. The channel is formed from two cylinders having a common central axis. Diffuse Maxwell reflection is used as a model for the reflection of gas molecules from cylinders. The gas flow is due to a small absolute value of the pressure gradient directed along the axis of the cylinders. The calculation of the mass flow of gas in the channel is carried out
depending on the rarefaction parameter and the ratio of the radii of the cylinders. The unknown function approximating the solution of the linearized ES equation is represented as a partial sum of the expansion in Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. By choosing interpolation nodes and applying the properties of finite sums of Chebyshev polynomials, the problem is reduced
to a system of linear algebraic equations with respect to the values of the desired function at these nodes. The expressions for the gas mass velocity in the channel and the gas mass flow are obtained in terms of the partial sums of the series of Chebyshev polynomials.
About the Authors
Oksana Vladimirovna GermiderRussian Federation
candidate of physical and mathematical sciences
Vasily Nikolaevich Popov
Russian Federation
doctor of physical and mathematical sciences
References
1. Holway, L.H., 1966, “New statistical models for kinetic theory: Methods of construction“, Physics
2. of Fluids, vol.9, pp. 1658-1673.
3. Andries, P., Bourgat, J-F., Le Tallec, P. & Perthame, B., 2002, “Numerical comparison between
4. the Boltzmann and ES-BGK models for rarefied gases“, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng., vol.
5. , no. 31. pp. 3369-3390.
6. Graur, I.A. & Polikarpov, A.P., 2009, “Comparison of different kinetic models for the heat
7. transfer problem“, Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 46, no. 2. pp. 237-244.
8. Belyi, V.V., 2015, “Derivation of model kinetic equation“, Europhysics Letters, vol. 111, pp.
9.
10. Chen, S., Xu K. & Cai, Q., 2015, “A comparison and unification of ellipsoidal statistical and
11. Shakhov BGK models“, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 7. pp. 245-266.
12. Ambrus, V. E., Sharipov, F. & Sofonea, V., 2020, “Comparison of the Shakhov and ellipsoidal
13. models for the Boltzmann equation and DSMC for ab initio-based particle interactions“,
14. Computers and Fluids, vol. 211. pp. 104637
15. Titarev V.A. & Frolova A.A., 2019, “Kinetic methods for solving unsteady problems“,
16. Mathematics and Mathematical Modeling, no. 04. pp. 34–51.
17. Breyiannis, G., Varoutis, S. & Valougeorgis, D., 2008, “Rarefied gas flow in concentric annular
18. tube: Estimation of the Poiseuille number and the exact hydraulic diameter“, European Journal
19. of Mechanics B/Fluids, vol. 27, pp. 609-622.
20. Baseri, A., Abbasbandy, S. & Babolian, E., 2018, “A collocation method for fractional diffusion
21. equation in a long time with Chebyshev functions“, Applied Mathematics and Computation,
22. vol. 322, pp. 55-65.
23. Shilkov, A.V., 2018, “Operator decomposition Scattering of the Particle Transport Equation in
24. a Series in Spherical Tensors“, Keldysh Institute Preprints named after M.V. Keldysh no. 249,
25. pp. (Russian).
26. Bhatnagar, P. L., Gross, E. P. & Krook, M. A., 1954, “Model for collision process in gases“,
27. Physical Review, vol. 94, pp. 511-525.
28. Cercignani, C. 1969, Mathematical Methods in Kinetic Theory, Plenum Press, New York, 227
29. p.
30. Mason, J. & Handscomb, D. 2003, Chebyshev polynomials, CRC Press, Florida, 360 p.
31. Boyd, J.2000, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, second ed., Dover, New York, 668 p.
32. Clenshaw, C. W. & Curtis, A. R. 1960, “A method for numerical integration on an automatic
33. computer“, Num. Math., vol. 2, pp. 197-205.
Review
For citations:
Germider O.V., Popov V.N. On the solution of the model kinetic equation ES. Chebyshevskii Sbornik. 2022;23(3):37-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2022-23-3-37-49