About the continuity of one operation with convex compacts in finite–dimensional normed spaces
https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2022-23-5-152-160
Abstract
In this paper, we study the deformation of the intersection of one compact set with a closed neighborhood of another compact set by changing the radius of this neighborhood. It is shown that in finite–dimensional normed spaces, in the case when both compact sets are non-empty convex subsets, such an operation is continuous in the topology generated by the Hausdorff metric.
The question of the continuous dependence of the described intersection on the radius of the neighborhood arose as a by–product of the development of the theory of extremal networks.
However, it turned out to be interesting in itself, suggesting various generalizations. Therefore, it was decided to publish it separately.
About the Author
Arsen Khachaturovich GaltyanRussian Federation
postgraduate student
References
1. Kantorovich, L. V. 1939, Mathematical methods of organization of production planning, Edition
2. of the Leningrad State University, Leningrad, p. 68.
3. Aho, A. V., Lam, M. S., Seti, R. & Ulman, D. D. 2008, Compilers: principles, technologies and
4. tools, 2–nd ed. : Trans. from English, OOO “I. D. Villiams”, Moscow, p. 1184.
5. Gabasov, R. & Kirillova, F. M. 1976, “Optimal control methods”, Itogi nauki i tekhniki. Ser.
6. Sovr. prob. mat., vol 6, pp. 133–259.
7. Shevchenko, V. N. & Zolotykh, N. Yu. 2004 Linear and integer linear programming, Publishing
8. house of the Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University, Nizhny Novgorod, p. 150.
9. Lenstra, H. W. 1983, “Integer Programming with a Fixed Number of Variables”, Mathematics
10. of Operations Research, vol 8, no. 4, pp. 538–548.
11. Kannan, R. 1987 “Minkowski’s Convex Body Theorem and Integer Programming”, Mathematics
12. of Operations Research, vol. 12, pp. 415–440.
13. Glover, F. 1990 “Tabu search–Part II”, ORSA Journal on Computing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 4–32.
14. Williams, H. P. 2009 Logic and integer programming, Springer New York, NY, p. 200.
15. Gardner, R. J., Hug D. & Weil W. 2013 “Operations between sets in geometry”, J. Eur. Math.
16. Soc., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2297–2352.
17. Mendelson, B. 1990 Introduction to topology, Dover Publications, p. 206.
18. Burago, D., Burago, Yu. & Ivanov, S. 2004 A course in metric geometry, Institute for Computer
19. Research, Moscow–Izhevsk, p. 512.
20. Ivanov, A. O. & Tuzhilin, A. A. 2017 Geometry of Hausdorff and Gromov–Hausdorff distances:
21. the case of compact sets, Faculty of mechanics and mathematics of MSU, Moscow, p. 111.
22. Alimov, A. R. & Tsarkov, I. G. 2014 “Connection and other geometric properties of suns and
23. Chebyshev sets”, Fundamental and applied mathematics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 21–91.
24. Leonard, I. E. & Lewis, J. E. 2015 Geometry of convex sets, Wiley, p. 336.
25. Galstyan, A. Kh., Ivanov, A. O. & Tuzhilin, A. A. 2021 “The Fermat–Steiner problem in the
26. space of compact subsets of R𝑚 endowed with the Hausdorff metric”, Sb. Math., vol. 212, no. 1,
27. pp. 25–56.
Review
For citations:
Galtyan A.Kh. About the continuity of one operation with convex compacts in finite–dimensional normed spaces. Chebyshevskii Sbornik. 2022;23(5):152-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2022-23-5-152-160